Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Llanos v. Blout et al
as 5:2022ct03299
Plaintiff:
Samual E. Llanos
Defendant:
Lt. Blout, Sgt. Snavely, Sgt. Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dixon v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00692
Plaintiff:
Tony Dixon
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DIXON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv06970
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TONY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bennett et al v. Parker et al
as 3:2019cv00456
Plaintiff:
Pshawn Oliver, Donald Peoples, Walter Patrick and others
Defendant:
Tony Parker and Donna Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett et al v. Holt et al
as 3:2019cv00455
Plaintiff:
Pshawn Oliver, Kedrick Carwell, Audarius Watts and others
Defendant:
Tony Parker
Petitioner:
Anthonhy Draine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Illinois Department Of Corrections et al
as 3:2016cv01222
Plaintiff:
Tony Dixon
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Wexford Health Care Services, Terry Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Illinois Department Of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv04646
Plaintiff:
Tony Dixon
Defendant:
Illinois Department Of Corrections and Wexler Health Care Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv02595
Plaintiff:
Toni Dixon
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Lamb v. Dixon et al
as 5:2015ct03178
Plaintiff:
Mark Andre Lamb
Defendant:
Tony Dixon, Lt. Johnson and North Carolina Department of Public Safety
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riggleman et al v. Cooper et al
as 2:2011cv00063
Plaintiff:
Dylan D. Riggleman , Timothy Riggleman and Joyce Riggleman
Defendant:
Tony Dixon Cooper and Art Puffenbarger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
