Cases 1 - 10 of 139
Rudd v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Tony Ray Rudd
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
United States v. Tony Waites
as 24-1316
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Tony Ray Waites
Cobbs v. Walmart
as 4:2023cv00033
Plaintiff:
Tony Ray Cobbs
Defendant:
Walmart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Petty v. Souza et al
as 1:2023cv00422
Defendant:
Keoni Bryant, Kevin Souza, Voltaire Gansit and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Ray Petty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baldwin v. SSI Satellite Sericer Inc et al
as 5:2023cv00711
Plaintiff:
Tony Ray Baldwin
Defendant:
SSI Satellite Sericer Inc, FNU Morgan, FNU Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baldwin v. Satellite Sericer, et al
as 23-6099
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TONY RAY BALDWIN
Defendant / Appellee:
SATELLITE SERICER INC., DEPUTY MORGAN, DETENTION OFFICER CARTER and others
Baldwin v. Satellite Sericer INC et al
as 5:2023cv00493
Plaintiff:
Tony Ray Baldwin
Defendant:
Satellite Sericer INC, Ms FNU Morgan, Mr FNU Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Baldwin v. Tulsa Jail et al
as 4:2023cv00144
Plaintiff:
Tony Ray Baldwin
Defendant:
Tulsa Jail, Satellite Sericer Inc., Ms Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Meeks v. Ray et al
as 4:2023cv00313
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Meeks
Defendant:
Tony Ray, Mark Johnson, LaSalle Southwestern doing business as Southwestern Corrections doing business as LaSalle Corrections LLC doing business as LaSalle Management Company LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baldwin v. Federal Election Commission et al
as 4:2022cv00506
Plaintiff:
Tony Ray Baldwin
Defendant:
Federal Election Commission and Satellite Sericer Inc. (SSI)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
