Cases 31 - 40 of 510
Johnson v. Kijakazi et al
as 0:2023cv00886
Plaintiff:
Torrence L Johnson, Sr.
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Torrence v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv19403
Plaintiff:
Brenda Torrence
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline, LLC, GlaxoSmithKline Holdings (Americas) Inc. and GlaxoSmithKline PLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407 Multidistrict Litigation
Downing v. Fumo et al
as 2:2023cv00419
Plaintiff:
Joseph Downing
Defendant:
Osvaldo Fumo, Kendall Stone, Torrence Douglas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01469
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
McMillian v. USA
as 7:2023cv00168
Petitioner:
Torrence Lesean McMillian
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Haley v. Wellpath, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00085
Plaintiff:
Edward C Haley
Defendant:
Garry L. McFadden, Wellpath, LLC, Mecklenburg County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TORRENCE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv01975
Plaintiff:
GARDNER M TORRENCE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Langhorne v. The County of Suffolk et al
as 2:2023cv00249
Plaintiff:
Torrance E. Langhorne and Torrence E. Langhorne
Defendant:
The County of Suffolk, Suffolk County Police Department, Det. Patrick McDermott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TORRENCE v. HUTCHINSON
as 1:2023cv00007
Petitioner:
TYRAIL TORRENCE
Respondent:
J. HUTCHINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
