Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Allen v. City of Dunn et al
as 5:2022cv00114
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E ALLEN and Thomas E. Allen
Defendant:
City of Dunn, TRAE GONZALES and APPELLES HART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COMPTON v. L. RICHARDSON PREYER FEDERAL BUILDING et al
as 1:2022cv00204
Plaintiff:
TRAE JAVAR COMPTON
Defendant:
L. RICHARDSON PREYER FEDERAL BUILDING, METROPOLITAN DETENTION CENTER L.A., DOCTOR T. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Estate of Dion Lamar Taylor v. Corbin et al
as 1:2022cv00634
Plaintiff:
Estate of Dion Lamar Taylor
Defendant:
Officer Trae Corbin, Officer Gershom Byrnes, Baltimore County Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
COMPTON v. MILLS et al
as 1:2021cv00811
Plaintiff:
TRAE JAVAR COMPTON
Defendant:
JUDGE J. MILLS and JUDGE THOMAS D. SCHROEDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
COMPTON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2021cv00749
Plaintiff:
TRAE JAVAR COMPTON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Crandell v. Hudgins
as 1:2021cv00063
Petitioner:
Trae Hakeem Crandell
Respondent:
R. Hudgins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Crandell v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv00056
Respondent:
R. Hudgins and United States of America
Petitioner:
Trae Hakeem Crandell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Andrews v. Virginia Employment Commission
as 3:2021cv00277
Plaintiff:
Trae Andrews
Defendant:
Virginia Employment Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crandell v. United States of America
as 5:2021hc02085
Petitioner:
Trae Hakeem Crandell
Respondent:
United States of America and R. Hudgins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Michael Donaldson v. Trae-Fuels, LLC
as 20-1236
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL DONALDSON
Defendant / Appellee:
ENVIROTECH SERVICES, INC. and TRAE-FUELS, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
