Cases 61 - 70 of 110
LORD v. LABBE et al
as 5:2016cv00209
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH LORD
Defendant:
FRANZ LABBE, TRANSAM TRUCKING INC and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Neme et al v. Elliott et al
as 4:2016cv00758
Plaintiff:
Ezzeddean Neme and Alia-Maria Rashied Neme
Defendant:
Transam Trucking, Inc. , Jeffrey Elliott , USAA General Indemnity Company and others
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134
CRST Expedited, Inc v. Transam Trucking Inc
as 1:2016cv00052
Plaintiff:
CRST Expedited, Inc
Defendant:
Transam Trucking Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KOMAZEC v. FAUCETT et al
as 2:2016cv01051
Plaintiff:
ZDRAVKO KOMAZEC
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER J. FAUCETT , TRANSAM TRUCKING, INC. , ABC CO, 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Deng v. TransAm Trucking, Inc. et al
as 8:2016cv00028
Defendant:
Todd Borning and TransAm Trucking, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Saositha Deng
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
MINTON et al v. DELANEY et al
as 2:2016cv00019
Plaintiff:
KENNETH MINTON and LISA MINTON
Defendant:
LORI DELANEY and TRANSAM TRUCKING, INC.
Mediator:
JOHN NOBLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
City of Massillon v. Parrish et al
as 5:2015cv02520
Plaintiff:
City of Massillon
Defendant:
Joseph Yang Parrish and TransAm Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MINTON et al v. DELANEY et al
as 2:2015cv06115
Plaintiff:
KENNETH MINTON and LISA MINTON
Defendant:
LORI DELANEY and TRANSAM TRUCKING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Transam Trucking, Inc. v. New England Motor Freight, Inc.
as 1:2015cv02135
Plaintiff:
Transam Trucking, Inc.
Defendant:
New England Motor Freight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fox, et al v. Transam Leasing, et al
as 15-3203
Plaintiff Counter Defendant - Appellee:
CANDACE FOX, ANTHONY GILLESPIE and CHARLES SCHRECKENBACH
Defendant Counterclaimant - Appellant:
TRANSAM TRUCKING, INC. and TRANSAM LEASING, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
