Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Aldridge v. Sweetwater Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Travis Lee Aldridge
Defendant:
Sweetwater Police Department, Caleb Norman, Matt Mckay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Murphy et al v. Hayes
as 2:2023cv00589
Plaintiff:
Amber Nicole Murphy and Travis Lee Murphy
Defendant:
Rachel Hayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Charles Rogers, Jr. v. Matthew Cline, et al
as 22-1282
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charles Clarence Rogers, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Detective Matthew D. Cline and Deputy Steven J. Scott
Defendant:
Dr. Travis Lee Bowen
Guy v. The Town of Slaughter, et al
as 3:2021cv00660
Defendant:
Dennis Guy, Town of Slaughter, Slaughter Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Benton County Sheriff's Office et al
as 5:2021cv05015
Plaintiff:
Charles Clarence Rogers, Jr.
Defendant:
Detective Matthew D. Cline, Benton County Sheriff's Office, Deputy Steven J. Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00553
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00386
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hutcheson v. City of Cave Springs, Arkansas et al
as 5:2017cv05026
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Hutcheson
Defendant:
City of Cave Springs, Arkansas, Travis Lee, Larry Fletcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Chuning v. Federal Screening System
as 3:2014cv01165
Plaintiff:
Travis Lee Chuning
Defendant:
Federal Screening System
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
