Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04999
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Phillips v. Treadwell et al
as 1:2023cv01912
Plaintiff:
Reginald Troy Phillips
Defendant:
Mark T. Treadwell, Leslie Abrams Garddner, Clay D. Land and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
University of Oregon v. Phillips
as 6:2021cv00619
Plaintiff:
University of Oregon
Defendant:
Troy Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Lake County, et al.
as 1:2020cv02756
Plaintiff:
Troy Phillips
Defendant:
Benjamin Longbons and Lake County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PHILLIPS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv10557
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TROY PHILLIPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PHILLIPS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv67064
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TROY PHILLIPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phillips v. Orleans County et al
as 1:2018cv00752
Defendant:
Civil Service Employees Association, Inc. Local 1000, AFSCME, AFL-CIO, Orleans County, Charles Nesbitt and others
Plaintiff:
Troy Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Troy Phillips v. Christopher Hufford, et al
as 17-3068
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TROY PHILLIPS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER HUFFORD, MICHAEL SMITH and MONICA GIPSON
PHILLIPS v. HUFFORD et al
as 1:2016cv01391
Defendant:
MONICA GIPSON, C. HUFFORD and MICHAEL SMITH
Plaintiff:
TROY PHILLIPS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. Karnes County, Texas, et al
as 5:2016cv00203
Defendant:
Robert C. Ebrom, Jr., Karnes County, Texas, David Morin and others
Plaintiff:
Kyle Ray Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
