Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Local 589, Amalgamated Transit Union et al v. MBTA
as 1:2016cv12489
Plaintiff:
Local 589, Amalgamated Transit Union and Tyrone Washington
Defendant:
MBTA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Washington v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2016cv07777
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Washington
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Deverick Scott v. Danny Burl, et al
as 15-3578
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Deverick Scott
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction and Arkansas Department of Correction
Defendant - Appellee:
Danny Burl, Warden, East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC, Dexter Payne, Assistant Warden, East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC, Todd Ball, Assistant Warden, East Arkansas Regional Unit, ADC and others
Washington v. Mr. Lakin et al
as 4:2015cv02684
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Washington
Defendant:
Mr. Lakin, Mr. Krantz and Kenneth Mayberry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Larkin
as 4:2015cv02697
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Washington
Defendant:
AA Larkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Berry
as 4:2015cv02695
Petitioner:
Tyrone Washington
Respondent:
Kenneth May Berry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Krantz
as 4:2015cv02696
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Washington
Defendant:
SM Krantz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Hollembaek
as 5:2015hc02124
Petitioner:
Kevin Tyrone Washington
Respondent:
Stephanie Hollembaek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Tyrone Washington v. Dean Dove, Warden
as 15-30434
Petitioner - Appellant:
TYRONE WASHINGTON
Respondent - Appellee:
DEAN DOVE, Warden, Natchitoches Parish Detention Center
Washington v. Dove et al
as 2:2014cv02130
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Washington
Defendant:
Dean Dove
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
