Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Theriot v. U.S. District Judges of Michigan et al
as 2:2019cv00195
Defendant:
Judge Magistrate Timothy P Greeley, Judge Unknown Siler, Judge Gordon J Quist and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Theriot
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Theriot #423068 v. Neff et al
as 2:2019cv00073
Defendant:
Unknown Cole, Unknown Clay, Paul L. Maloney and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dwayne Theriot #423068
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Valenzuela #172770 v. Moody et al
as 2:2017cv03263
Plaintiff:
Melinda Gabriella Valenzuela
Defendant:
Chris Moody, Regina Dorsey, Joel Breuault and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Valenzuela #172770 v. Moody et al
as 2:2017cv01582
Plaintiff:
Melinda Gabriella Valenzuela
Defendant:
Chris Moody, Regina Dorsey, Joel Breuault and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jonathan Smith v. A Construction Company, et al
as 16-4312
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jonathan D. Smith
Defendant - Appellee:
A Construction Company, et al, State of Missouri, City of St. Louis and others
Smith-El v. A Construction Company et al
as 4:2016cv01743
Plaintiff:
Jonathan D. Smith-El
Defendant:
A Construction Company, State of Missouri, City of St. Louis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richards v. Hogans et al
as 3:2015cv00839
Plaintiff:
James Richards
Defendant:
Norris Hogans, Ray Rice, R. Pennington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferguson v. Hogans et al
as 3:2015cv00666
Plaintiff:
James M. Ferguson
Defendant:
H. Hogans, Unknown Thomas, M. Braxton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cottingham v. Clay et al
as 4:2014cv02458
Plaintiff:
Steven Earl Cottingham
Defendant:
Unknown Clay, Unknown Miranda, Unknown Molinar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Saenz v. Clay et al
as 4:2014cv02422
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ray Saenz
Defendant:
Unknown Clay and Federal Correctional Institution-Tucson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
