Cases 71 - 80 of 249
Ramsey v. Unknown John Doe Officers
as 1:2018cv04698
Defendant:
UNKNOWN JOHN DOE OFFICERS
Plaintiff:
Starr Ramsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farvour et al v. United States of America
as 3:2018cv05386
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Farvour and Elaine Farvour
Defendant:
United States of America, Unknown John Does and John Doe Clinics
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Lytle v. Name Unknown / John Doe et al
as 5:2018cv05028
Plaintiff:
Robert-Larry Lytle
Defendant:
Name Unknown / John Doe, U.S. Grand Jury Foreperson, Tammy Ludeman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Julius J. Harang et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv02998
Defendant:
Apple Inc, Tim Cook, John Flynn and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Glaze, Stephen Goerke, Julius J. Harang and others
Sahoo et al v. Hayner et al
as 5:2018cv00095
Plaintiff:
Rachel Sahoo and Gourab Sahoo
Defendant:
Richard Hayner, Sweetly Sanders, Unknown John Doe Supervisors and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyler v. City of Omaha et al
as 8:2018cv00030
Defendant:
City of Omaha, County of Douglas, State of Nebraska and others
Plaintiff:
Billy Tyler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Sauls et al
as 1:2018cv00131
Plaintiff:
Monteria Najuda Robinson
Defendant:
William Sauls, Steve Schreckengost, Steve O'Hare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harang et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as ILN/1:17-cv-08500
Plaintiff:
Julius J. Harang , Norbert Hennrich , Betsy Hennrich and others
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc. , Rasier, LLC , Travis Kalanick and others
Williams v. Sharpeshope et al
as 4:2017cv00290
Plaintiff:
Cecil Williams
Defendant:
Sharpeshope, Deputy Warden, Hammock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wix v. United States of America et al
as 3:2017cv05994
Plaintiff:
Penny Wix
Defendant:
United States of America, Unknown John Does and Unknown John Doe Clinics
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
