Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80585
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Huss v. USA Group et al et al
as 1:2022cv04592
Plaintiff:
Travis Duane Huss
Defendant:
USA Group et al, Joe Biden, FBI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
GRICE v. CHIEF MAGISTRATE et al
as 5:2022cv00088
Plaintiff:
LLOYD DEMETRIUS GRICE
Defendant:
CHIEF MAGISTRATE, US MILITARY COURTS and PENSACOLA BANK OF AMERICAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Egler v. United States of America et al
as 2:2020cv02438
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Maricopa County Public Defender's Office, Jared Kushner and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Silvanus Egler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv00266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clear v. Jones et al
as 4:2020cv00494
Defendant:
City of Kansas City Missouri, Chrishanna Jones, US Military and others
Plaintiff:
Donald E Clear
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wilder v. US Military et al
as 3:2018cv05053
Plaintiff:
Jack Ryan Wilder
Defendant:
US Military, US Government, CIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoffman v. US Federal Government et al
as 1:2016cv00244
Plaintiff:
Michael Richard Hoffman
Defendant:
US Federal Government and US Military
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Khaimov v. US Enterprise Architecture Framework et al
as 1:2015cv09001
Plaintiff:
Roman Khaimov
Defendant:
US Enterprise Architecture Framework, Cyberwarefare, NYPD Sex Cyber and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Khaimov v. U.S. DOPRA et al
as 1:2015cv08836
Plaintiff:
Roman Khaimov
Defendant:
U.S. DOPRA, Canadian Darpa, Asia Chinesse Darpa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
