Cases 21 - 30 of 63
Tuk v. Vika Logistics LLC et al
as 2:2019cv00134
Defendant:
Michael Lynn Carter, Arnaldo Gonzalez, Starr Indemnity & Liability Company and others
Plaintiff:
Vincent E. Tuk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Correll v. Vika Logistics LLC et al
as 2:2019cv00136
Defendant:
Michael Lynn Carter, Arnaldo Gonzalez, Starr Indemnity & Liability Company and others
Plaintiff:
Courtney Correll
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Correll v. Vika Logistics LLC et al
as 2:2019cv00135
Defendant:
Michael Lynn Carter, Arnaldo Gonzalez, Starr Indemnity & Liability Company and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Correll
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Augustine v. Manning II et al
as 3:2019cv00844
Defendant:
Mountain Lake Risk Retention Group, Inc., Eric L Manning II and US Xpress, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kerra Augustine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv02540
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gilkes v. US XPRESS, Inc.
as 1:2019cv01627
Defendant:
US XPRESS, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Errpl Gilkes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Marks v. US Xpress Inc et al
as 2:2019cv00005
Plaintiff:
Ronald Marks
Defendant:
US Xpress Inc, Lay Moo Keyler, Jeremiah Layklermoo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES, ET AL V. DAIMLER TRUCKS NORTH AMERICAN, LLC., ET AL
as 1:2018cv03362
Plaintiff:
SHARAINE FURLOW, KATRINA SANDELL SULLIVAN and DENEANE ELEANORE JONES
Defendant:
INDIANA MILLS & MANUFACTURING, INC., US XPRESS, INC., FEDEX SUPPLY CHAIN, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cooper-Roell v. Target Corporation
as 3:2018cv00260
Plaintiff:
Holly Cooper-Roell
Defendant:
Target Corporation, US Xpress, Inc., and Dedric Wilcott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TALBERT v. US XPRESS INC
as 5:2018cv00260
Plaintiff:
BRADLEE TALBERT
Defendant:
US XPRESS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
