Cases 1 - 8 of 8
BANKS et al v. HORNAK et al
as 2:2014cv00362
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS and RAFAEL CABRERA
Defendant:
MARK R. HORNAK, ERIC ROSEN, DAVID HICTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Banks v. Does, et al
as 2:2013cv00064
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Charles Samuels, Mike Doyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Keefe Company Distribution Network et al
as 4:2012cv01292
Plaintiff:
Howard Mack Harris
Defendant:
Keefe Company Distribution Network, Cal Casieu-Parish Regional Detention Center, Cybersuit Money Deposit.Com.Organization and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Frederick Banks v. Hillary Clinton, et al
as 12-2168
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Frederick Banks, An American Indian
Defendant - Appellee:
Hillary Rodham Clinton, Kathleen Sebelius, Internal Revenue Service and others
Banks v. Clinton et al
as 4:2012cv00183
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Hillary Rodham Clinton, Kathleen Sebelius, Internal Revenue Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Williams et al
as 5:2010cv00041
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Unknown Williams, Unknown Henderson, Unknown Hutchings and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Jonathan Riches v. Bruce Horovitz
as 08-8245
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant - Appellee:
BRUCE HOROVITZ, d/b/a USA Today Reporter, JULIE SCHMIT, d/b/a USA Today Reporter and DEL JONES, d/b/a USA Today Corporate Management Reporter
Jonathan Riches v. Bruce Horovitz
as 08-7890
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE RICHES
Defendant - Appellee:
BRUCE HOROVITZ, d/b/a USA Today Reporter, JULIE SCHMIT, d/b/a USA Today Reporter and DEL JONES, d/b/a USA Today Corporate Management Reporter
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
