Cases 81 - 90 of 3,827
Thomas v. Warden
as 6:2024cv00004
Petitioner:
Albert Thomas, III
Respondent:
USP McCreary Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kozman v.United States Postal Service et al
as 4:2024cv00048
Defendant:
USPS - Postal Service, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Mona Kozman
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Johnson v. United States of America et al
as 5:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
DiAngelo K. Johnson
Defendant:
United States of America and USP Coleman II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Davis v. USP Big Sandy
as 7:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
De'Maurea Davis
Defendant:
USP Big Sandy, C. Niece, Lt. Compton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Torres v. USP Beaumont
as 1:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Francisco Torres
Defendant:
USP Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Carr et al v. United States et al
as 3:2023cv02875
Plaintiff:
Brian P Carr, Rueangrong Carr and Buakhao Von Kramer
Defendant:
United States, US Department of Justice, United States Postal Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Marshall Williams v. FCC Coleman - USP I Warden
as 23-14232
Petitioner:
MARSHALL DEWAYNE WILLIAMS
Respondent:
FCC COLEMAN - USP I WARDEN
Manuel v. Parrett et al
as 1:2023cv13232
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Manuel
Defendant:
Khalid L Parrett, United States Department of Justice and USPS Office of Inspector General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Davis v. USP Big Sandy
as 2:2023cv00817
Plaintiff:
Demaurea Davis and De'Maurea Davis
Defendant:
USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Eliel Mata-Arrevalo v. USP Atlanta Warden
as 23-14230
Petitioner:
ELIEL MATA-ARREVALO
Respondent:
USP ATLANTA WARDEN and FCI JESUP WARDEN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
