Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1246
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Morgan, et al. v. Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation, et al.
as 23-4236
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NATHANIEL MORGAN, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated and MICHAEL BEVAN, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant:
HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND CORPORATION, doing business as UTC Aerospace Systems doing business as Collins Aerospace, ROHR INC, UNITED TECHNOLOGY TRADE CORP. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv01346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01013
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Fox v. DCO LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00120
Defendant:
DCO LLC, Eaton Corporation, Henkel Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Eldon Fox, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Moss v. Goodrich Corporation
as 8:2021cv02383
Plaintiff:
James B Moss
Defendant:
Goodrich Corporation doing business as UTC Aerospace Systems
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodriguez-Severino v. UTC Aerospace Systems
as 20-1901
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MIGUEL RODRIGUEZ-SEVERINO
Defendant / Appellee:
UTC AEROSPACE SYSTEMS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01316
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lisa Truong v. UTC Aerospace Systems
as 20-1769
Defendant / Appellee:
UTC Aerospace Systems
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lisa Truong
Morgan v. Rohr, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00574
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Morgan
Respondent:
Hamilton Sundstrand Corporation, Rohr Inc, United Technology Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
