Cases 61 - 70 of 259
Conyers v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs
as 22-1590
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Vincent Curtis Conyers
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Veterans Affairs
SUTTON v. MCDONOUGH et al
as 2:2022cv01030
Plaintiff:
THOMAS SUTTON
Defendant:
SECRETARY DENIS MCDONOUGH, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, JANE DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2292
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Irwin Jacobwitz et al v. Rick Hawthorne et al
as 2:2022cv04038
Plaintiff:
Irwin Jacobwitz, Pearl H. Jacobwitz, Dakota D. Jacobwitz and others
Defendant:
Rick Hawthorne, Larry Thornton, Virginia Hawthorne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01823
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Vargas v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 8:2022cv00940
Plaintiff:
Johnny Vargas, Jr.
Defendant:
United States Department of Veterans Affairs, James A. Haley Veterans Hospital and United States Department of Defense
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02968
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Conyers v. United States Department of Ve
as 22-970
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Vincent Curtis Conyers
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-2032
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
