Cases 71 - 80 of 878
Michael Hill v. Denis McDonough
as 23-1797
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Hill
Defendant / Appellee:
Denis McDonough, Secretary United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-60191
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01267
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hoosier et al v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs
as 3:2023cv00295
Plaintiff:
Mark N. Hoosier and Michaela R. Hoosier
Defendant:
United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01043
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-385
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rice v. Wintrust Financial Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv00296
Plaintiff:
Daniel R. Rice
Defendant:
Wintrust Financial Corporation, Wintrust Mortgage, Wintrust Residential Mortgage and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Thomas Sutton v. Secretary United States Department of Veterans Aff, et al
as 23-1414
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS SUTTON
Defendant / Appellee:
SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, FAYETTE EMS, JW RUBY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL and others
Elizabeth Curry White v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs
as 3:2023cv01083
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Curry White
Defendant:
United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1457
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
