Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Bowling v. Spohn et al
as 1:2024cv00490
Plaintiff:
Roger Bowling
Defendant:
Nathan Spohn, Unknown James and Unknown Monroe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kirk #231238 v. Monroe et al
as 1:2020cv01049
Defendant:
J. Clave, L. Paris, Lori A. Blanchard and others
Plaintiff:
Maurice Poche Kirk #231238
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meeks #176401 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv00839
Plaintiff:
Anthony Meeks #176401
Defendant:
Shauna Dunning, Bridget M. McCormack, S. Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGinnis v. Monroe et al
as 4:2020cv00228
Plaintiff:
Matthew McGinnis
Defendant:
Unknown Schleuter, Unknown Monroe and County of Warren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kohn #199940 v. Crompton et al
as 1:2019cv00814
Plaintiff:
James Frank Kohn #199940
Defendant:
Unknown Crompton, Unknown Monroe, Michigan Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rouser #822775 v. Mason et al
as 1:2019cv00473
Plaintiff:
Khiry Rouser #822775
Defendant:
Kandi M. Mason, Patricia Lamb, Unknown Monroe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Honicky v. Penzone et al
as 2:2018cv00879
Plaintiff:
Mark C Honicky
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Unknown Monroe and Unknown Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Biddie v. Director, TDCJ-CID et al
as 6:2017cv00506
Plaintiff:
Harold Curtis Biddie
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID, Unknown Monroe and Ametha Pinson-Majette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCollum v. Forrest County Jail et al
as 2:2014cv00145
Plaintiff:
Derrick Gleenard McCollum
Defendant:
Forrest County Jail, Billy Magee, Unknown Jaconey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark #222915 v. Lindemuth et al
as 2:2012cv00219
Plaintiff:
Aaron Clark #222915
Defendant:
T. Lindemuth, Unknown Briggs, Catherine S. Bauman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
