Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Poke v. Clark et al
as 4:2022cv00613
Plaintiff:
Courtnee T. Poke
Defendant:
Lt. Pamela Clark, C/O I Unknown Boatman, C/O I Unknown Darden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eidam #266232 v. Kent, County of et al
as 1:2020cv00538
Defendant:
Unknown Nolan, Niles, City of, Hailie Micheal and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Richard Eidam #266232
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-16369
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Birks et al v. GinJoint LLC et al
as 2:2015cv02464
Plaintiff:
Robert W Birks , Thomas Colburn and Aaron Post
Defendant:
GinJoint LLC , Joe Nolan, Unknown Nolan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02393
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Godfrey v. Swift et al
as 6:2009cv00082
Plaintiff:
Mark Godfrey
Defendant:
Unknown Swift, Unknown Meracle, Unknown Orig and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Godfrey v. Swift et al
as 6:2009cv00061
Plaintiff:
Mark Godfrey
Defendant:
Warden Swift, Doctor Orig, Unknown Nolan and others
Consol Defendant:
Unknown Meracle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Albritton v. Quarterman et al
as 6:2008cv00268
Plaintiff:
Fiance Albritton
Defendant:
Nathaniel Quarterman, Unknown Thompson, Unknown Swift and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Moreno v. Tupou et al
as 3:2007cv00140
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Moreno
Defendant:
Leitoni Tupou, Garland Armstrong, Debbie Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Singleton v. Stubblefield et al
as 4:2007cv00352
Plaintiff:
Tyron E. Singleton
Defendant:
Gene Stubblefield, Administration at City Justice Center, Unknown Nolan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
