Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Camera v. Semple et al
as 3:2018cv01595
Plaintiff:
Patrick Camera
Defendant:
Cary Freston, Scott Semple, Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Giddins v. Geisinger Medical Center et al
as 4:2018cv00815
Plaintiff:
Master Giddins
Defendant:
Geisinger Medical Center, Bureau of Prisons, Robert Pellecchia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bane v. United States of America, The
as 2:2017cv03371
Plaintiff:
Ben W Bane
Defendant:
United States of America, The, Mr Pacheco, Adam Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCOTT v. MCGANN et al
as 1:2017cv08389
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH SCOTT
Defendant:
STEPHANIE MCGANN, RODRIGUEZ, CANDICE JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harris v. Figura et al
as 3:2017cv01614
Plaintiff:
Leroy Harris
Defendant:
Figura, Knight, Jeff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Webster v. United States of America et al
as 3:2017cv01350
Defendant:
Known and Unknown Parties, United States of America and Utilization Review Committee Members of Federal Correctional Institution Sheridan Health Services Department
Plaintiff:
Don A. Webster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCOTT v. MCGANN et al
as 1:2017cv05865
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH SCOTT
Defendant:
STEPHANY MCGANN, DENISE RODRIGUEZ, THE MEDICAL UTILIZATION REVIEW COMMITTEE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Little v. Murphy
as 16-3610
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jermaine Little
Defendant - Appellee:
Peter J. Murphy, Individual Capacity, Maldonado, Lt., Individual Capacity, Nunez, Lt., Individual Capacity and others
Ronald Douds v. USA, et al
as 16-2351
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD E. DOUDS
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UTILIZATION REVIEW COMMITTEE
Melvin v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2016cv00537
Plaintiff:
Martin Melvin
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Department of Corrections, Board of Pardons & Paroles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
