Cases 1 - 8 of 8
MERS, LLC v. M/V CHARLES L STRAIT et al
as 5:2022cv00099
Plaintiff:
MERS, LLC
Defendant:
M/V CHARLES L STRAIT, M/V TATE OGLESBY, M/V BILLY STRAIT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
MERS, LLC v. WRBM, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv02441
Plaintiff:
MERS, LLC
Defendant:
WRBM, LLC, M/V Charles L Strait, M/V Tate Oglesby and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 31342 Breach of Maritime Contract
Young et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2021cv10006
Plaintiff:
Alan R. Young, Alberta Edwards, Allyscia D. Roseman-Frazer and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Doylan Rivers v. Neil Turner, et al
as 16-4241
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOYLAN V. RIVERS
Defendant - Appellee:
NEIL TURNER, in his individual and official capacity as Warden of NCCC, BLAKE HUNT, in his individual capacity, [UNKNOWN] SHAEFFER, in their individual capacity and others
United States of America v. Graestone Logistics LLC et al
as 5:2016cv00152
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Graestone Logistics LLC , Glenn E. Daulton, Inc , Bertucci Contracting Co., LLC and others
Cross_claimant:
M/V River Titan , Graestone Logistics LLC , Barge GD-896 and others
Cross_defendant:
Barge GD-896 , Bertucci Contracting Co., LLC , Glenn E. Daulton, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Rivers v. Turner et al
as 3:2014cv02547
Plaintiff:
Doylan V. Rivers
Defendant:
Neil Turner, F.N.U. Hunt, F.N.U. Shaeffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spooner et al v. Hall et al
as 1:2011cv02327
Plaintiff:
Christine McDaniel Spooner and Michael Spooner
Defendant:
Shirley A. Hall, C. Griffin, Forbes/FCSO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paparo v. Cosco Container Lines et al
as 1:2011cv10642
Plaintiff:
Derek Paparo
Defendant:
Cosco Container Lines and C/V RIVER WISDOM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
