Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Cordova et al v. Valspar Corporation et al
as 2:2020cv02325
Plaintiff:
Steven Hart and Jodie Cordova
Defendant:
Sherwin-Williams Company, Valspar Corp, The Sherwin-Williams Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cowles v. The Valspar Corporation
as 1:2015cv00013
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Cowles
Defendant:
The Valspar Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Kresta v. Valspar Corporation
as 3:2015cv00003
Plaintiff:
John Kresta
Movant:
Karen Zablonsky
Defendant:
The Valspar Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Garofalo v. Valspar Corporation
as 3:2012cv00753
Plaintiff:
Christine Garofalo
Defendant:
Valspar Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Halton et al v. Valspar Corp.
as 2:2010cv02400
Plaintiff:
Luke Halton and Dennis Bier
Defendant:
Valspar Corporation & Subsidiaries
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HALTON et al v. VALSPAR CORPORATION & SUBSIDIARIES
as 2:2010at01312
Plaintiff:
LUKE HALTON and DENNIS BIER
Defendant:
VALSPAR CORPORATION & SUBSIDIARIES
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Simmons et al v. Valspar Corporation
as 0:2010cv03026
Plaintiff:
Shane Simmons and Chris Cook
Defendant:
Valspar Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Dougherty v. The Valspar Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv01302
Plaintiff:
Patrick Dougherty
Defendant:
The Valspar Corporation and The Valspar Corporation, Short Term Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Cross v. Valspar Corporation
as 1:2007cv01041
Plaintiff:
Ben Cross
Defendant:
Valspar Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Marini v. Samuel Cabot Incorporated Employees' Stock Ownership Plan et al
as 1:2007cv10311
Plaintiff:
Robert L Marini
Defendant:
Samuel Cabot Incorporated Employees' Stock Ownership Plan, Samuel Cabot Incorporated Employees' Stock Ownership Plan, Samuel Cabot, 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1337 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
