Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00780
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Vahn Williams v. Scott Massengill
as 25-2051
Plaintiff:
VAHN OMAR WILLIAMS
Defendant:
SCOTT MASSENGILL, Administrative Law Judge, MR. SIMMONS, Case Worker, MR. IMADOJEMUN, Supervisor and others
Williams v. Boscov
as 1:2025cv01581
Plaintiff:
Vahn Omar Williams
Defendant:
Jim Boscov
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Williams v. Nationwide Property & Casualty Insurance Company-37877
as 1:2025cv01531
Plaintiff:
Vahn Omar Williams
Defendant:
Nationwide Property & Casualty Insurance Company-37877
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Williams v. Massengill et al
as 1:2024cv03122
Defendant:
SSA, Scott Massengill, Mr. Simmons and others
Plaintiff:
Vahn Omar Williams
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Disability Definition
Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv01132
Plaintiff:
Vahn O Williams
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 id Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
SMITH v. POPKIN et al
as 3:2020cv13219
Defendant:
MARY ELLIOT, JANET KEENEN, GEORGE VAHN and others
Plaintiff:
MARIAH SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STARNES v. VAHN
as 1:2020cv00871
Respondent:
JAMES VAHN
Petitioner:
DAMION DONTE STARNES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pino v. Griffin et al
as 1:2015cv00840
Plaintiff:
Raymond L. Pino
Defendant:
Marty Vahn Griffin and Central Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Bawden v. Richins et al
as 2:2012cv01178
Plaintiff:
Heidi Bawden
Defendant:
Teresa Richins, Jason McClellan, Richard Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
