Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Sports Rehab Consulting, et al v. Vail Clinic
as 26-1271
Plaintiff:
SPORTS REHAB CONSULTING LLC, a Colorado limited liability company and LINDSAY WINNINGER, an individual
Defendant:
VAIL CLINIC, INC., a Colorado nonprofit corporation, DBA Vail Health
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv07846
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02886
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr - Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02889
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr - Notice of Removal
California Pacific Medical Center-Davis Campus v. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
as 3:2026cv06238
Plaintiff:
Tulsa Regional Medical Center, California Pacific Medical Center-Davies Campus, Doctors Medical Center-San Pablo Campus and others
Defendant:
Robert F Kennedy, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv07369
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02364
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Habeas Corpus: INS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv02371
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Habeas Corpus: INS
Tom Dowdy v. Amy Vail, et al
as 26-2189
Plaintiff:
TOM CURTIS DOWDY
Defendant:
AMY VAIL, DANIELLE STUBBLEFIELD and WILLIAM MANN, Sgt.
STORMONT-VAIL REGIONAL HEALTH CENTER v. KENNEDY
as 1:2026cv01794
Plaintiff:
STORMONT-VAIL REGIONAL HEALTH CENTER
Defendant:
ROBERT F. KENNEDY, JR.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
