Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Tom Dowdy v. Amy Vail, et al
as 26-2189
Plaintiff:
TOM CURTIS DOWDY
Defendant:
AMY VAIL, DANIELLE STUBBLEFIELD and WILLIAM MANN, Sgt.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01489
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Bisaillon v. Vail Resorts
as 26-1148
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER BISAILLON, an individual, on behalf of himself and those similarly situated
Defendant:
VAIL RESORTS INC., a Delaware corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv01191
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Vailes v. ASC Ortho Management Company, LLC
as 8:2026cv01607
Plaintiff:
Wendii Vailes
Defendant:
ASC Ortho Management Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv01843
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv04033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Goloja et al v. Vail Resorts, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv01191
Plaintiff:
Landin Goloja, Tyler Maybee, Caitlan Reynolds and others
Defendant:
Vail Resorts, Inc. and Alterra Mountain Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
VAIL v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2026cv01857
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLEY RAY VAIL
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jimenez-Gomez, et al. v. Blanche
as 26-1380
Petitioner:
IRMA YOHANA JIMENEZ-GOMEZ, ANDY MILTON VAIL-JIMENEZ and SANTOS BRAYAN VAIL-JIMENEZ
Respondent:
PAMELA BONDI, ATTORNEY GENERAL and TODD BLANCHE, ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
