Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Cauchi et al v. 3M COMPANY, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company et al
as 2:2025cv11575
Plaintiff:
Ellis Cauchi, Mary Cavanaugh, Shelley Cecala and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., AMEREX CORPORATION, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Clark v. Lowes Home Centers, LLC
as 4:2024cv03578
Defendant:
Lowes Home Centers, LLC
Plaintiff:
Valerie Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Gann et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2024cv00765
Plaintiff:
Dennisha Green, Angel Aguilar, Dori Buster Hanson and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Roberts v. Barnwell et al
as 6:2023cv06243
Plaintiff:
Chavana Roberts
Defendant:
Ruth Barnwell, Christopher McClary, Q'asia Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roberts v. McFadden et al
as 6:2023cv06230
Plaintiff:
Chavana Roberts
Defendant:
Johnathan McFadden, Tiffany Kincade, Chardonnae Barfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Matherly v. Clark et al
as 3:2020cv00935
Defendant:
Officer Renada Tillery, Nurse Wytasha Howell, Officer Chicarla Sykes and others
Plaintiff:
Administrator Daniel Thomas Matherly and Daniel Thomas Matherly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLARK et al v. DAVOL, INC./C.R. BARD, INC.
as 2:2019cv01457
Defendant:
DAVOL, INC./C.R. BARD, INC.
Plaintiff:
STEVEN A CLARK and VALERIE CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Brooks v. Obama et al (MAG+)
as 3:2010cv00125
Plaintiff:
Danny L. Brooks
Defendant:
Barack H. Obama, Eddie Brown, Leah Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
