Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Vickers v. Enterprise Leasing Company of Florida, LLC et al
as 8:2026cv02053
Plaintiff:
Sherman Vickers
Defendant:
Enterprise Leasing Company of Florida, LLC, Enterprise Holdings, Inc. and Does 1 through 20, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Washington v. McMaster et al
as 4:2026cv00733
Plaintiff:
Marcus L Washington
Defendant:
Andrew McMaster, Shell Gas Station, Circle K and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vickers v. Nulo Inc.
as 2:2026cv04105
Plaintiff:
Lachae Vickers
Defendant:
Nulo Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Sichanthavong v. Scholl
as 2:2026cv00125
Plaintiff:
Vicker Sichanthavong
Defendant:
Johnny Scholl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WARREN v. PIEDMONT COLUMBUS REGIONAL HOSPITAL
as 4:2026cv00884
Plaintiff:
JESSE WARREN
Defendant:
PIEDMONT COLUMBUS REGIONAL HOSPITAL, DONALD M VICKERS, MARC S GOLDMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Medical Malpractice
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv04994
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Green v. Harris County et al
as 4:2026cv04268
Plaintiff:
Morris Paul Green
Defendant:
Harris County, Ed Gonzalez, R. Viser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
