Cases 1 - 10 of 1,535
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00755
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Burandt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00751
Plaintiff:
Corliss O. Burandt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Baucom et al v. Torres Vidal
as 2:2024cv01818
Plaintiff:
Shelley L Baucom and Joseph Baucom
Defendant:
Samira M Torres Vidal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
US Inventor, Inc. et al. v. Vidal et al.
as 1:2024cv00708
Plaintiff:
Us Inventor, Inc., Inventors Association Of South Central Kansas, Inventors Network Of Minnesota and others
Defendant:
Katherine Vidal and United States Patent and Trademark Office
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Maritime Subsidy Board
MazedIn re: Mazed
as 24-1756
Appellant:
In re: MOHAMMAD A. MAZED
Defendant / Appellee:
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Polidi v. Boston et al
as 5:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Richard Polidi
Defendant:
Louis Boston, David Shewchuk, Charletta Blackshear and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
In re: Cahill
as 24-1745
Appellant:
In re: BRET EDWARD CAHILL
Defendant / Appellee:
KATHERINE K. VIDAL, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office
Talavera-Vidales v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv01170
Plaintiff:
Antonio Talavera-Vidales
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Vidal v. King et al
as 3:2024cv01015
Petitioner:
Tommy Ray Vidal
Respondent:
Adam King and Leslie Rachael Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00672
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
