Cases 31 - 40 of 88
Somchai Noonsab v. NC Government
as 16-7005
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SOMCHAI NOONSAB
Defendant - Appellee:
NORTH CAROLINA, W. BROWN, STEPHEN MCDANIEL RUSSELL, SR. and others
Noonsab v. NC Government et al
as 5:2016ct03122
Plaintiff:
Somchai Noonsab
Defendant:
NC Government, W. Brown, Stephen M Russell, Sr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Van Dyke v. U.S. Federal Department of Correction et al
as 1:2016cv00133
Plaintiff:
Dennis Roger Van Dyke
Defendant:
U.S. Federal Department of Correction, Lacey Thornburg, Charles McKeller and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Lester Hayes v. W. Brown
as 16-6431
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LESTER M. HAYES
Defendant - Appellee:
W. BROWN, Correction Officer Segregation
Defendant:
C. ST. JEAN, Director of Armor Medical Company, VCU/MCV HOSPITAL, Hospital, PIXLEY, Warden and others
Van Dyke v. Abernathy et al
as 1:2016cv00062
Plaintiff:
Dennis R. Van Dyke
Defendant:
Wayne Abernathy, Kent W. Brown, Clerk of Court Rutherford County, District, Superior and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Samuels v. Gelfman et al
as 1:2016cv00722
Plaintiff:
Victor E. Samuels
Defendant:
Lenore Gelfman, Mary M Kramer, Corrie A. Boulay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Brown v. United States Of America
as 1:2016cv00061
Plaintiff:
Michael W. Brown
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Browning v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv12441
Plaintiff:
Wendy W. Browning
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Croslin v. Baltimore Police Office W. Brown III
as 1:2015cv01997
Plaintiff:
Errence Croslin
Defendant:
Baltimore Police Office W. Brown III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
