Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Robinson et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv13649
Plaintiff:
Emilia L. Robinson and Paul W. Robinson
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Sofradim Production SAS and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robinson et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv03175
Plaintiff:
Patricia E. Robinson and Gary W. Robinson
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc., American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mandigo et al v. Kappos
as 1:2012cv01193
Plaintiff:
Frank N. Mandigo , Peter W. Robinson , Derek E. Tyler and others
Defendant:
David J. Kappos
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 146 Appeal of Decision of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences
Robinson v. Davis
as 8:2011cv00556
Plaintiff:
James W. Robinson
Defendant:
R.L. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Myers v. Davis et al
as 3:2010cv00873
Plaintiff:
Deena Kaye Myers
Defendant:
Keith Davis, Clyde Alderman, Jerry Streat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Warden
as 8:2010cv02152
Plaintiff:
James W. Robinson
Defendant:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. SunTrust Bank
as 1:2010cv00686
Plaintiff:
Woodrow W. Robinson, III
Defendant:
SunTrust Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Bannamon et al v. City of Fayetteville et al
as 5:2010cv00069
Plaintiff:
Valparisia R. Bannamon and Moses W. Robinson
Defendant:
City of Fayetteville, Dale Iman, Anthony G. Chavonne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROBINSON v. ATTY. GENERAL OF THE STATE OF N.C. et al
as 1:2010cv00136
Plaintiff:
ROBIN W. ROBINSON
Defendant:
ATTY. GENERAL OF THE STATE OF N.C. and SHERIFF'S DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. N.C. ATTY. GENERAL
as 1:2010cv00086
Plaintiff:
ROBIN W. ROBINSON
Defendant:
N.C. ATTY. GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
