Cases 21 - 30 of 473
Romero v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc
as 1:2020cv01490
Plaintiff:
Samuel Romero
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Romero v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc
as 1:2020at00811
Plaintiff:
Samuel Romero
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Soboleski v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc Associates' Health and Welfare Plan
as 6:2020cv02919
Plaintiff:
Aleksandra Soboleski
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc Associates' Health and Welfare Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Hager v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.'s Associates' Health and Welfare Plan et al
as 3:2020cv00233
Defendant:
Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.'s Associates' Health and Welfare Plan
Plaintiff:
Andrea Hager
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Sluss v. Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston et al
as 5:2020cv05057
Plaintiff:
Colleen Sluss
Defendant:
Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Zamora et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00401
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., DOES 1-100, Sam's West, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jesenia Zamora and Brandon Griego
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maupin v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 2:2020cv00897
Plaintiff:
Aaron Maupin
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Vineyard v. Wal-Mart, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00007
Defendant:
Wal-Mart, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Associates' Health and Welfare Plan and Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston
Plaintiff:
William Vineyard
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Renati v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00273
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Wal-Mart
Plaintiff:
Claudia Renati
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Stout v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00290
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and Wal-Mart
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Stout
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
