Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Jones Clanton v. Walden University, LLC et al
as 1:2026cv06715
Defendant:
Covista, Inc., Walden E-Learning, LLC and Walden University, LLC
Plaintiff:
Krishna Jones Clanton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Trademark Infringement
Walden v. Gowdy
as 2:2026cv14076
Plaintiff:
Christian Walden
Defendant:
Gowdy
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-13867
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
DEWITT v. WALDEN et al
as 1:2026cv02246
Plaintiff:
BRANDON JOE DEWITT
Defendant:
ISAAC WALDEN and MASON FISHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McNutt v. Burton et al
as 1:2026cv00505
Plaintiff:
Aaron McNutt
Defendant:
Devon Burton, Mr. Walden, Officer Dayo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mahmoud v. United States District Court for the District of Nevada, Las Vegas
as 26-6463
Petitioner:
MOHAMED ABDALLA MAHMOUD
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS
Real Party In Interest:
BRIAN WILLIAMS, JEREMY BEAN, JULIE WILLIAMS and others
Walden v. Village of Clinton Police Department et al
as 2:2026cv13717
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Walden
Defendant:
Village of Clinton Police Department and Officer Dillon Howe
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03357
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Linwood Walden v. Joseph Walters
as 26-7020
Petitioner:
LINWOOD GEQUAN WALDEN
Respondent:
CHADWICK DOTSON, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections and JOSEPH WALTERS, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Dunn v. French et al
as 2:2026cv02046
Plaintiff:
Damien Dunn
Defendant:
Brittney French, Kevin Kellum, Jordan Lambert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
