Cases 1 - 10 of 100
STANTS v. WALSH et al
as 2:2026cv01572
Plaintiff:
SHAUN DALE STANTS
Defendant:
JASON WALSH and JACOB MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Pizzano v. Walsh et al
as 3:2026cv02063
Plaintiff:
Felicity York Pizzano
Defendant:
Edward T. Walsh, Vanluvender and Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Weinberg v. Healey et al
as 1:2026cv13362
Plaintiff:
Robert Paul Weinberg
Defendant:
Attorney General Maura Healey, Lisa Wolfe, Stanley Spero and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Prete v. Benjamin et al
as 1:2026cv00474
Plaintiff:
Michael Prete
Defendant:
Mark Benjamin, Peter Neronha, Stephen Dambruch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WALSH v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2026cv05138
Plaintiff:
BRIAN WALSH
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
DURDEN v. BEVACQUA et al
as 3:2026cv08885
Plaintiff:
SHAKEEM DURDEN
Defendant:
HON. CHRISTIE L. BEVACQUA, DOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTAKE HEARING OFFICER, OFFICER WALSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daniel Feldman v. Sreit Ivy Louisville, LLC, et al
as 26-5633
Plaintiff:
DANIEL FELDMAN
Defendant:
SREIT IVY LOUISVILLE, LLC, dba The Ivy Apartment Homes, HIGHMARK RESIDENTIAL, LLC, ASHLEY LEMONS and others
Payton v. Glasgow et al
as 1:2026cv08414
Plaintiff:
Tobias Payton
Defendant:
James W. Glasgow, John Doe, Daniel M. Walsh and others
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walsh v. City of Chicago
as 1:2026cv08255
Plaintiff:
Mark Walsh
Defendant:
City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
