Cases 1 - 10 of 22
JONES v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2023cv03851
Plaintiff:
AKHENATON JONES
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER THOMPSON, C.O. JACKSON, NURSE DOES 1-4 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mood v. Warden Doe
as 3:2023cv00218
Petitioner:
TRACY MOOD
Respondent:
WARDEN DOE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mood v. Warden Doe
as 1:2023cv00462
Petitioner:
Tracy Mood
Respondent:
Warden Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Martinez-Felix v. Management & Training Corporation (MTC) et al
as 5:2021cv00282
Plaintiff:
Alvaro Martinez-Felix
Defendant:
Management & Training Corporation (MTC), Warden Doe John 5:21-CV-282 and Doe John 5:21-CV-282
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
May v. Taycheedah Correctional Institution et al
as 2:2020cv01674
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Jennifer McDurmott, Lt Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
Edith Mae May
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wills v. Doe et al
as 3:2020cv00989
Defendant:
Medical Director Doe, Warden Doe and Dietary Supervisor Doe
Plaintiff:
Zachary Wills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Snelson et al
as 2:2019cv01994
Defendant:
Officer Speaks, Officer Phillips, Officer Snelson and others
Plaintiff:
John King, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conquistador v. Cook et al
as 3:2019cv01471
Defendant:
Officer Doe, Rollin Cook, April and others
Plaintiff:
Jean Karlo Conquistador
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amezquita v. Hough et al
as 3:2019cv01461
Plaintiff:
Jose G. Amezquita
Defendant:
Assoc. Warden DOE 2, Sergeant DOE 3, Warden DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
FISHER v. HOLLINGSWORTH
as 1:2018cv16793
Plaintiff:
TONY FISHER and KELLIE REHANNA
Defendant:
ANNA MORFE, UNIT DOE, MR. WILLIAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
