Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Carroll v. Hierholzer et al
as 5:2019cv00095
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wayne Carroll
Defendant:
Jeffery Purvis, Officer FNU Bowman and Sheriff Rusty Hierholzer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carroll v. Moran Foods, LLC et al
as 8:2018cv02229
Defendant:
Moran Foods, LLC and Save, LLC.
Plaintiff:
Wayne Carroll
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Vidal v. The State of New York et al
as 1:2018cv06184
Defendant:
Eric T. Schneiderman, F. Ortiz, Anthony J. Annucci and others
Plaintiff:
Vidal Joseph and Joseph Vidal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ricky Giddens, et al v. Hugh Lawson, et al
as 17-10169
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICKY GIDDENS and LYDIA GIDDENS
Defendant - Appellee:
HUGH LAWSON, Senior District Judge, W. LOUIS SANDS, Senior District Judge, THOMAS Q. LANGSTAFF, Magistrate Judge and others
E Bar J Trucking LLC v. American Wind Transport Group LLC et al
as 5:2015cv00847
Plaintiff:
E Bar J Trucking LLC
Defendant:
American Wind Transport Group LLC , American Transport Inc and William Wayne Carroll
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GIDDENS et al v. LAWSON et al
as 7:2015cv00099
Plaintiff:
RICKY GIDDENS and LYDIA GIDDENS
Defendant:
HUGH LAWSON, W LOUIS SANDS, THOMAS Q LANGSTAFF and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
USA v. Wayne Park
as 14-6517
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WAYNE CARROLL PARKS
Carroll v. Biomet Inc et al
as INN/3:13-cv-00726
Plaintiff:
Tony Wayne Carroll
Defendant:
Biomet Inc, Biomet Orthopedics LLC, Biomet US Reconstruction LLC and others
Carroll v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2013cv00726
Plaintiff:
Tony Wayne Carroll
Defendant:
Biomet Inc , Biomet Orthopedics LLC , Biomet US Reconstruction LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Carroll v. Astrue
as 2:2012cv01170
Plaintiff:
Wayne Carroll
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
