Cases 1 - 10 of 443
Wheatley v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2024pq01355
Plaintiff:
Charles Wheatley
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Syngenta AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wheatley v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv02884
Plaintiff:
Charles Wheatley
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Millsaps v. King et al
as 4:2024cv00341
Plaintiff:
Travon D Higgins
Defendant:
Ashley N King, Corey Haynie, JD Wheatley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Higgins v. King et al
as 4:2024cv00340
Plaintiff:
Travon D Higgins
Defendant:
Ashley N King, Corey Haynie, JD Wheatley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Luxco, Inc. v. Nelson County et al
as 3:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Luxco, Inc.
Defendant:
Nelson County, Nelson County Fiscal Court, Judge Executive Tim Hutchins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Ingersoll v. Wheatley et al
as 1:2024cv00947
Plaintiff:
Michael Ingersoll
Defendant:
Daren Wheatley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wheatley v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00010
Petitioner:
Jayson Dwayne Wheatley
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Kamensky et al v. Dorresette et al
as 0:2023cv62333
Plaintiff:
Eugene B. Kamensky and James H. Wheatley
Defendant:
Colleen Dorresette and Michael Farnborough
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
