Cases 21 - 30 of 138
Whitefield et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2021cv01742
Defendant:
Police Officer Anthony Saline, JOHN DOES 1 -10, City of New York and others
Plaintiff:
Jahlil Whitefield, Hassan Salley Rae and Hassan Salley Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00039
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Whitefield v. WETZEL
as 2:2021cv00340
Defendant:
LAWRENCE KRASNER and JOHN WETZEL
Plaintiff:
Alfred Whitefield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00013
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Baker et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2021cv00100
Plaintiff:
Casey Baker, Rowdy Huff, Shawn Kiser and others
Defendant:
Aearo Technologies LLC and 3M Company
Scalia v. Zipp Express, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv01094
Defendant:
Zipp Express, LLC, Zipp Express, LLC Group Health Plan and Ronnie C. Whitefield
Plaintiff:
Eugene Scalia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Danville Christian Academy Inc, et al v. Andrew Beshear
as 20-6341
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DANVILLE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY, INC. and COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, ex rel. Attorney General Daniel Cameron
Defendant / Appellant:
ANDREW G. BESHEAR, in his official capacity as Governor of the Commonwealth of KY
Amicus Curiae:
PARENTS OF KY RELIGIOUS SCHOOL STUDENTS, LEXINGTON LATIN SCHOOL, TOM OTTO and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02111
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Can't Stop Productions, Inc v. Sixuvus, Ltd.
as 20-2227
Intervenor:
Karen Willis, DBA Harlem West Entertainment
Counter Claimant:
Eric Anzalone, Alexander Briley, Raymond Simpson and others
Plaintiff:
Can't Stop Productions, Inc
In Re: Karen L. Willis
as 20-1639
Respondent:
Sixuvus, Ltd, Raymond Simpson, Felipe Rose and others
Petitioner:
Karen Willis, DBA Harlem West Entertainment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
