Cases 71 - 80 of 3,272
Lewis v. Calhoun et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00364
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Sonya Thompson, CMC Barnes and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Morris v. Trump et al
as 1:2021cv04445
Defendant:
President Donald J. Trump, Comm. Andrew Saul, United States of America (GOV) and others
Plaintiff:
Keith S. Morris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Perkins v. Trump, Sr. et al
as 0:2021cv01219
Respondent:
John Ashcroft, Mr. Barack Obama, Mr. William J. Clinton and others
Petitioner:
Victor B. Perkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00610
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McCarroll v. Gill
as 21-1094
Defendant / Appellee:
Dana Ng, Mr., Raytheon, William Tong, Mr., Attorney General, Connecticut, Lamont, Governor, State of Connecticut and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Margaret McCarroll
Boring v. Jones et al
as 6:2021cv06062
Plaintiff:
David Boring and David Baring
Defendant:
Prosecuting Attorney Trent Daniels, United States Senate, Nurse Betty Doe II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles v. Jones et al
as 6:2021cv06058
Defendant:
Prosecuting Attorney Trent Daniels, United States Senate, Nurse Betty Doe II and others
Plaintiff:
David Charles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Novak, Jr. v. Jones et al
as 6:2021cv06055
Defendant:
Prosecuting Attorney Trent Daniels, United States Senate, Nurse Betty Doe II and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Novak, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clayton v. Jones et al
as 6:2021cv06064
Defendant:
Prosecuting Attorney Trent Daniels, United States Senate, Nurse Betty Doe II and others
Plaintiff:
Rayson Clayton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Jones et al
as 6:2021cv06065
Defendant:
Prosecuting Attorney Trent Daniels, United States Senate, Nurse Betty Doe II and others
Plaintiff:
Darius Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
