Cases 1 - 10 of 130
Preston v. Scotts Bluff County, Nebraska et al
as 4:2024cv03090
Plaintiff:
Brenda L. Preston
Defendant:
Scotts Bluff County, Nebraska, Scotts Bluff County Adult Detention Center, Advanced Correctional Healthcare, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Wrongful Death
Ward (PS) v. Armijo et al
as 1:2024cv01256
Plaintiff:
Demontray Ward and Demontray Larell Ward
Defendant:
A. Armijo, Avery, T. Maine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wiseman v. Adams
as 4:2024cv00533
Petitioner:
Edward Wiseman
Respondent:
Richard Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lee v. Wiseman et al
as 1:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Jason Lamar Lee
Defendant:
Shane L. Wiseman and Caruthersville Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carlson v. Ortiz et al
as 1:2023cv01439
Plaintiff:
Benjmain Carlson
Defendant:
Adrian Ortiz, Alexandria Norville, Andrew Erikson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BYRD v. HARPER et al
as 2:2023cv01726
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. BYRD and Al-Tariq Sharif Ali Byrd
Defendant:
WARDEN ORLANDO HARPER, CHIEF DEPUTY LAURA K. WILLIAMS, DEPUTY DAVID ZETWO, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01854
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donald Reynolds v. D. Young
as 23-6346
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD REYNOLDS
Defendant / Appellee:
D. L. YOUNG, Warden, MANNING, SIS officer, SWEENY, SIS officer and others
Jones v. Epley et al
as 1:2022cv00239
Plaintiff:
Mark Lee Jones
Defendant:
FNU Epley and FNU Wiseman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
