Cases 31 - 40 of 645
USA v. Devin Wiseman
as 23-5788
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DEVIN WISEMAN
WISEMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv23151
Plaintiff:
AMBER WISEMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cesarman v. Cayuga Capital Management LLC et al
as 1:2023cv04441
Plaintiff:
Josefina Cesarman
Defendant:
Cayuga Capital Management LLC, James Wiseman, Jacob Sacks and others
Rosemarie Wiseman, et al v. Santiva, Incorporated, et al
as 23-1932
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ROSEMARIE C. WISEMAN and CARY W. WISEMAN
Defendant / Appellant:
SANTIVA, INCORPORATED, doing business as BETTER TASTE, doing business as TASTEFULLY BETTER, doing business as POP BOX US, doing business as SANTIVA INTERNATIONAL and RAYMOND S. HENNING
BROWN v. TOWN OF CORYDON et al
as 4:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
MAXINE F. BROWN
Defendant:
TOWN OF CORYDON, PAUL HAMANN, HOPE SCHNEIDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wiseman v. Reeves
as 2:2023cv00379
Plaintiff:
Sandra K. Wiseman
Defendant:
Mary Haines Reeves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv04036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01675
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
