Cases 1 - 10 of 899
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02264
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Michael Waddell v. Vincent Vantell
as 24-5971
Respondent:
VINCENT VANTELL, Warden
Petitioner:
MICHAEL WADDELL
Waddell v. Jones et al
as 1:2024cv00174
Defendant:
Dr. Lee Larowe, Kyle Price and Deshawn Jones
Plaintiff:
Terrance Waddell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Waddell et al v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2024pq02247
Defendant:
Does 1 through 60 inclusive, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and others
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Linda Waddell and Kimberly Waddell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HOOVER v. WADDELL et al
as 1:2024cv00762
Petitioner:
ANTHONY L. HOOVER
Respondent:
STEPHEN WADDELL, JOHN GRAY and STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Elkharwily v. First Interstate Bank et al
as 3:2024cv05720
Plaintiff:
Alaa Elkharwily
Defendant:
First Interstate Bank, Jennifer Mattson, Mathew Waddell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Jason Tyrrell, et al v. Richard Robinson, et al
as 24-1702
Defendant:
T. COBBS, Grievance Coordinator, JEFFREY WHITE, Former Assistant Deputy Warden, DOCTOR FRACIES and others
Plaintiff:
ALVIN DWAYNE FRAZIER and JASON ALAN TYRRELL
KRAEMER v. WADDELL
as 1:2024cv02481
Plaintiff:
THOMAS KRAEMER
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
TINA M. WADDELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Tommie Mason v. Lewis Young, et al
as 24-2669
Defendant:
Marshall Dale Reed, Chief Deputy Director/Commissioner of the State of Arkansas Department of Correction, Pine Bluff Unit, Deborah L. Goodwin, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, Pine Bluff Unit, Waddell, Hearing Officer Administrator, Pine Bluff Unit and others
Plaintiff:
Tommie E. Mason
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
