Cases 41 - 50 of 127
Aliahmed et al v. Kondash et al
as 1:2020cv01097
Plaintiff:
Kelly E.S. Aliahmed, Evonca Sakinah S. Aliahmed, Muhammad Aliahmed and others
Defendant:
Lt. Ruth E. Dixon, Bureau Chief Shane Troxler, Deputy Warden John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Doe et al
as 3:2020cv05828
Plaintiff:
Michael DeWayne Allen
Defendant:
Warden John Doe, Nurse Muroko, Sergeant Guevara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mack v. United States of America et al
as 1:2020cv00354
Defendant:
McDowell Medical Staff, PA Carothess, Warden C. Maruka and others
Plaintiff:
Leonte Mack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SPIVEY v DOES, et al.
as 5:2020cv00185
Plaintiff:
MANDRIEZ SPIVEY
Defendant:
WARDEN JOHN DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oliver v. Yaphank Correctional Facility et al
as 2:2020cv01877
Defendant:
Officer John Doe 3, Officer John Doe 2, Yaphank Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff:
Virtue Mekhi Oliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perilloux v. Doe
as 3:2020cv00234
Defendant:
Warden John Doe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Hulen Perilloux
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tietz v. Corizon Health, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv10814
Defendant:
Deputy Warden John Doe, RUM Batho, Alan Greason and others
Plaintiff:
Cameron Tietz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Doe et al
as 3:2020cv00310
Defendant:
F.D.O.C. Secretary Julie Jones, The Warden John Doe, C/O John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Alexander F. Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WRIGHT v. COUNTY INVESTIGATING OFFICER JOHN DOE et al
as 2:2020cv00613
Respondent:
CORRECTIONAL SGT JOHN DOE #2, GEO GROUP, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER CLARK and others
Petitioner:
WILLIAM EDWARD WRIGHT, 3RD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Doe
as 8:2020cv00002
Defendant:
Warden John Doe
Plaintiff:
Leonard Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
