Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Eco-Fuels LLC v. Sarker et al
as 1:2022cv00250
Plaintiff:
ECO-FUELS LLC
Defendant:
DR. MOINUDDIN SARKER and WASTE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
In Re: Liquid Waste Technology
as 19-392
Undetermined:
Poolscape Pool & Spa, LLC, Michael Martocci and Michelle Willard, as Administratrix of the Estate of James Willard
Plaintiff:
Guilford Yacht Club Association, as owner pro hac vice of the amphibious dredge vessel MUD CAT MFD and Unit Owners Association at Guilford Yacht Club, Inc., as owner pro hac vice of the amphibious dredge vessel MUD CAT MFD
Defendant / Appellant:
Ellicott Dredge Technologies
Petitioner:
Liquid Waste Technology, LLC, as owner of Mud Cat MFD petitioning for exoneration from or limitation of liability, DBA Ellicott Dredge Technologies
In Re: Liquid Waste Technology, LLC
as 3:2018cv01306
Petitioner:
Liquid Waste Technology, LLC d/b/a Ellicott Dredge Technologies, Liquid Waste Technology, LLC and Liquid Waste Technology, LLC As owner of Mud Cat MFD petitioning for exoneration from or limitation of liability doing business as Ellicott Dredge Technologies
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Carlson et al v. Corizon Health Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv01490
Plaintiff:
Eric Carlson and Elfie Blair-Carlson
Defendant:
Corizon Health Incorporated , Corizon Incorporated , Corizon LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Graham Group (US) Inc. v. Liquid Waste Technology, LLC et al
as 0:2012cv00766
Plaintiff:
Graham Group (US) Inc.
Defendant:
Liquid Waste Technology, LLC and IMS Dredges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-3302
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00788
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
