Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Punam Gohel v. Wayne Holloway et al
as 2:2018cv09909
Defendant:
Renne Thomos, Wayne Holloway and Does 1 to 10
Plaintiff:
Punam Gohel
Punam Gohel v. Wayne Holloway et al
as 2:2018cv08340
Defendant:
Renee Thomos, Wayne Holloway and Does 1 to 10
Plaintiff:
Punam Gohel
Holloway v. USA-2255
as 1:2016cv02514
Petitioner:
David Wayne Holloway
Respondent:
USA-2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Atwell et al v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 2:2011cv00384
Plaintiff:
Peggy Atwell , L. Jolene Baker , Rita Ballesteros and others
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company, AAIPharma, Inc., AAIPharma Services Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Atwell et al v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 2:2011cv02019
Plaintiff:
Peggy Atwell , L Jolene Baker , Rita Ballesteros and others
Defendant:
Eli Lilly & Co, Aaipharma Inc, A A I Pharma Services Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Timothy Holloway v. Pagan River Dockside Seafood
as 11-1046
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY WAYNE HOLLOWAY
Defendant - Appellee:
PAGAN RIVER DOCKSIDE SEAFOOD, INCORPORATED and JOSEPH L. MELZER, JR.
Holloway v. Pagan River Dockside Seafood, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv00093
Plaintiff:
Timothy Wayne Holloway
Defendant:
Pagan River Dockside Seafood, Inc. and Joseph L. Melzer, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688 Jones Act
Rogers v. Humphreys County, Mississippi et al
as 4:2009cv00037
Plaintiff:
Christopher James Rogers
Defendant:
Humphreys County, Mississippi, Humphreys County Sheriff Department, Wayne Holloway and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00861
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Anderson v. Humphreys County Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 4:2007cv00203
Plaintiff:
Wilbur Anderson
Defendant:
Humphreys County Sheriff's Dept., Wayne Holloway and "Unknown" Roseman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
