Cases 1 - 10 of 41
(PC) Taylor v. Nail et al
as 2:2024cv00744
Plaintiff:
Harold Wayne Taylor
Defendant:
Amanda Nail, Mary Banks, N. Bayar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 2:2024cv00183
Petitioner:
Leonard Wayne Taylor
Respondent:
Ricky Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TAYLOR v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2024cv00092
Petitioner:
LEONARD WAYNE TAYLOR
Respondent:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Taylor v. Lumpkin
as 23-40104
Petitioner / Appellant:
Richard Wayne Taylor
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Taylor v. USA
as 2:2023cv04035
Petitioner:
Jeffery Wayne Taylor
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Taylor v. Lumpkin
as 22-40692
Petitioner / Appellant:
Richard Wayne Taylor
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Taylor v. Turn Key et al
as 5:2021cv05184
Plaintiff:
Brice Wayne Taylor
Defendant:
Turn Key, Dr. Robert Saez, Nurse Molly Roy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Kenosha County Jail et al
as 2:2019cv01778
Plaintiff:
Leonard Wayne Taylor
Defendant:
Daniel Lahare, Kenosha County Jail, David Beth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Kenosha County Clerk of Court et al
as 2:2019cv01632
Plaintiff:
Leonard Wayne Taylor
Defendant:
Kenosha County Clerk of Court, Kenosha County Jail and David Beth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2019cv00149
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Richard Wayne Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
