Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Wendell Brown v. Tanya Pratt
as 14-1974
Petitioner:
WENDELL BROWN, now known as MENES ANKH EL
Respondent:
TANYA WALTON PRATT, District Judge
Party-in-Interest:
GILBERT PETERS, Superintendent, Branchville Correctional Facility and BRUCE LEMMON, Commissioner, State of Indiana Department of Corrections
Menes Ankh El v. Tanya Walton Pratt
as 13-3814
Petitioner:
WENDELL BROWN, now known as MENES ANKH EL
Respondent:
TANYA WALTON PRATT, District Judge
Party-in-Interest:
GILBERT PETERS, Superintendent, Branchville Correctional Facility and BRUCE LEMMON, Commissioner, State of Indiana Department of Corrections
USA v. James Brown
as 13-3062
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
James Wendell Brown, also known as Jimmy
Darmaine Browning v. USA
as 13-1655
Petitioner - Appellant:
DARMAINE WENDELL BROWNING
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
HAYNES et al v. THE CITY OF DURHAM, N.C. et al
as 1:2012cv01090
Defendant:
THE CITY OF DURHAM, N.C., MARK WENDELL BROWN, JR., DANNY REAVES and others
Plaintiff:
ROBYN HAYNES and ERIC JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN-EL v. MARION COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS et al
as 1:2012cv00331
Plaintiff:
Noble WENDELL BROWN-EL
Defendant:
C. DAMIAN CORNACCHIONE, MARION COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS and MARION COUNTY TREASURER
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
BROWN-EL v. RENNER et al
as 1:2012cv00250
Plaintiff:
Noble WENDELL BROWN-EL
Defendant:
JENOLA HINTON, MARION COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and MARK RENNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blalock et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc.
as 3:2012cv00423
Plaintiff:
Donna Blalock , James Blalock , Wendell Brown and others
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Thomas P Schmalzried
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Browning v. USA
as 2:2012cv10459
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Darmaine Wendell Browning
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
