Cases 1 - 10 of 141
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00560
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00444
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Grech Motors Incorporated v. Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation
as 2:2021cv00291
Defendant:
Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation a foreign corporation doing business as Wabtec Corporation doing business as Vapor Bus International
Plaintiff:
Grech Motors Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01601
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Siemens Mobility, Inc. v. Westinghouse Air Brake
as 20-1008
Defendant / Appellant:
WABTEC RAILWAY ELECTRONICS, INC. and WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, dba Wabtec Corporation
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SIEMENS MOBILITY, INC.
Siemens Mobility, Inc. v. Westinghouse Air Brake
as 19-2413
Defendant / Appellee:
WABTEC RAILWAY ELECTRONICS, INC. and WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, dba Wabtec Corporation
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SIEMENS MOBILITY, INC.
Westinghouse Air Brake v. Siemens Mobility, Inc.
as 19-1877
Appellant:
WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Appellee:
SIEMENS MOBILITY, INC.
Siemens Mobility, Inc. v. Westinghouse Air Brake
as 19-1752
Appellee:
WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Appellant:
SIEMENS MOBILITY, INC.
Siemens Mobility, Inc. v. Westinghouse Air Brake

as 19-1732
Appellee:
WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Appellant:
SIEMENS MOBILITY, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.