Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Robert Annabel, II v. Jackson County, MI Sheriff Department, et al
as 26-1814
Plaintiff:
ROBERT WAYNE ANNABEL, II
Defendant:
JACKSON COUNTY, MI SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, ADVANCED HEALTH CARE, SHERIFF GARY SCHUTTE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-2282
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Wetmore-Tinney v. Rivera
as 2:2026cv00297
Petitioner:
Raymond Wetmore-Tinney
Respondent:
Frank Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv07483
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Morgan v. Dixon et al
as 3:2026cv00342
Plaintiff:
James T. Morgan
Defendant:
Ricky D. Dixon, C. Bowden, Clayton Weiss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv01450
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
RHETT v. CAMDEN CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2025cv12103
Plaintiff:
THALIA RHETT
Defendant:
CAMDEN CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, COLIN WETMORE, COLLEEN DOYLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bonano v. Sheahan
as 25-1452
:
MICHAEL BONANO and LOUIS E. TILLINGHAST, Corrections Officer
Defendant:
Captain MONTEGARI, VENTOZZI, Director of Special Housing and Inmate Discipline, DOCCS, CHARLES ESGROW, Commissioner's Hearing Officer and others
Christie-Wetmore v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2025sf65840
Plaintiff:
Kellie Christie-Wetmore
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc. and Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc., F/K/A MonoSol Rx, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00697
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
