Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Toribiong v. Whipps, Jr.
as 4:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
Christa N. Toribiong
Defendant:
Surangel Whipps, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Whipps v. GlaxoSmithKline et al
as 3:2023cv14415
Plaintiff:
Sims Whipps
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline, Patheon Inc., Pfizer Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Joseph Whipps v. K. Bennett
as 23-1289
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSEPH JOHN WHIPPS
Respondent / Appellee:
K. BENNETT, Warden, FCI Pekin
Whipps v. Warden FCI Pekin
as 1:2022cv01456
Petitioner:
Joseph John Whipps
Respondent:
Warden FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Whipp v. Wells
as 2:2022cv01350
Petitioner:
Michael J Whipp
Respondent:
Mr J Wells
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mannon v. Whipps et al
as 4:2021cv00955
Plaintiff:
Kevin Mannon
Defendant:
Justin J Whipps, Keith Waddle, A Culclager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Whipps et al
as 4:2021cv00519
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Andrews, A Culclager and others
Plaintiff:
Melvin Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owens v. Payne et al
as 4:2021cv00220
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Aundrea Culclager, Justin J Whipps and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph W Owens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthew Tassone, et al v. Elizabeth Gill, et al
as 19-3626
Defendant / Appellee:
ZEPHYNIA TASSONE, JUDGE ELIZABETH GILL, Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, Division of Domestic Relations, MAGISTRATE DAVID BLACK, Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, Division of Domestic Relations and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW TASSONE
Plaintiff:
L.T., Minor Child
Tassone et al. v. Judge Elizabeth Gill et al.
as 2:2019cv01683
Defendant:
Zephynia Tassone, Judge Elizabeth Gill, John C Ruiz-Bueno, III and others
Plaintiff:
L.T.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
