Cases 1 - 10 of 928
Adams v. SSA
as 6:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Christy Mashell Adams
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Adams v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01086
Plaintiff:
April Adams
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Adams v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv01310
Plaintiff:
Stacey Adams
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Pondi v. O'Malley
as 7:2024cv02684
Plaintiff:
Seth Adam Pondi
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Adams v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00598
Plaintiff:
Andrea Dawn Adams
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Reef v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Michael Adam Reef
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Yet Classified:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Henderson v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Adam Daniel Henderson
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Adams v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00343
Plaintiff:
Jamie Lea Adams
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
(SS) Saur v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
Adam Saur
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
French v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 8:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Adam French
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
