Cases 1 - 10 of 2,572
DAVIS v. FRANKLIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION et al
as 4:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
LLOYD ANTHONY DAVIS
Defendant:
FRANKLIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, REGION 1 PHARMACY and FNU PAWKK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Pate et al
as 5:2024ct03099
Plaintiff:
Daniel Isaiah Thomas
Defendant:
Lt. Pate, Robeson County, Burnis Wilkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Franklin Correctional Institution et al
as 5:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Anthony Davis
Defendant:
Franklin Correctional Institution, Region 1 Pharmacy and FNU Pawkk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 2:2024cv00156
Petitioner:
LLOYD ANDERSON
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzalez (PS) v. Austin et al
as 1:2024cv01015
Plaintiff:
Alfredo P. Gonzalez
Defendant:
Lloyd Austin, Burnes and Mayorkas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02187
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swindler v. Hanlin et al
as 6:2024cv00590
Plaintiff:
Allen Lloyd Swindler
Defendant:
Sheriff John Hanlin and Clayton Ruble
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Downing v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Downing
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections, Sean Caughron and W.R. Hensley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lloyd v. Mackey
as 1:2024cv00622
Petitioner:
Cronie Lloyd
Respondent:
Acting Warden Misty Mackey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eckstein v. Lloyd et al.
as 1:2024cv00514
Plaintiff:
Andrew Eckstein
Defendant:
Inspector Diane Lloyd, Warden Jennifer Black and Lutinent D. Thrasher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
